MOV vs. FOSL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL).

Performance

MOV vs. FOSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MOV vs. FOSL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOV Movado Group, Inc.	18.43%	13.86%	-30.56%	2.02%	-19.68%	159.46%	-23.55%	-28.95%	0.13%	14.30%
FOSL Fossil Group, Inc.	14.63%	125.15%	14.38%	-66.13%	-58.11%	18.69%	10.03%	-49.90%	102.45%	-69.95%

Fundamentals

EPS MOV : $1.17 FOSL : -$0.97
PS Ratio MOV : 0.82 FOSL : 0.17
Total Revenue (TTM) MOV : $671.31M FOSL : $1.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) MOV : $363.60M FOSL : $563.10M
EBITDA (TTM) MOV : $41.07M FOSL : $18.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOV achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly higher than FOSL's 14.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MOV has outperformed FOSL with an annualized return of 2.34%, while FOSL has yielded a comparatively lower -20.45% annualized return.

MOV

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 30.87%
• 1Y: 58.71%
• 3Y*: 2.31%
• 5Y*: 3.37%
• 10Y*: 2.34%

FOSL

• 1D: 6.68%
• 1M: -7.91%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 67.70%
• 1Y: 274.78%
• 3Y*: 10.44%
• 5Y*: -19.16%
• 10Y*: -20.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MOV vs. FOSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOV

MOV Risk / Return Rank: 81
MOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
MOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MOV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MOV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FOSL

FOSL Risk / Return Rank: 93
FOSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FOSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FOSL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FOSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FOSL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOV vs. FOSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOV	FOSL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.64	-1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.21	-1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	5.45	-3.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	15.07	-8.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOV vs. FOSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the FOSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOV and FOSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOV	FOSL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	2.64	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	-0.21	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	-0.21	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.02	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between MOV and FOSL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MOV vs. FOSL - Dividend Comparison

MOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, while FOSL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOV Movado Group, Inc.	5.73%	6.79%	7.11%	7.96%	4.34%	2.27%	0.00%	3.68%	2.53%	1.61%	1.81%	1.71%
FOSL Fossil Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MOV vs. FOSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOV drawdown since its inception was -86.06%, smaller than the maximum FOSL drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOV and FOSL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOV	FOSL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.06%	-99.44%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.66%	-52.27%	+28.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.64%	-95.42%	+28.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.73%	-98.18%	+15.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.62%	-96.88%	+62.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.23%	-48.70%	+17.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.81%	18.91%	-11.10%

Volatility

MOV vs. FOSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) is 12.14%, while Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) has a volatility of 24.51%. This indicates that MOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOV	FOSL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.14%	24.51%	-12.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.82%	78.04%	-52.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.75%	104.89%	-64.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.40%	89.87%	-50.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.66%	95.92%	-49.26%

Financials

MOV vs. FOSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Movado Group, Inc. and Fossil Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Movado Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 103.63M and revenue of 191.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.1%.

FOSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 160.95M and revenue of 280.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.4%.

MOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Movado Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.81M and revenue of 191.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

FOSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 839.00K and revenue of 280.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

MOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Movado Group, Inc. reported a net income of 12.56M and revenue of 191.58M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

FOSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported a net income of 21.27M and revenue of 280.52M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.