PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSL vs. CFRUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Compagnie Financiere Richemont (CFRUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSL achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than CFRUY's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSL has underperformed CFRUY with an annualized return of -17.61%, while CFRUY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.


FOSL

1D
-3.84%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
6.65%
6M
7.80%
1Y
208.46%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
-21.76%
10Y*
-17.61%

CFRUY

1D
-1.61%
1M
11.76%
YTD
2.42%
6M
2.37%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
17.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
6.65%125.15%14.38%-66.13%-58.11%18.69%10.03%-49.90%102.45%-69.95%
CFRUY
Compagnie Financiere Richemont
2.42%44.64%12.76%10.15%-10.95%70.67%15.96%23.07%-27.42%39.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSL and CFRUY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2009

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FOSL:

$234.18M

CFRUY:

$130.03B

EPS

FOSL:

-$1.13

CFRUY:

€1.06

PS Ratio

FOSL:

0.22

CFRUY:

2.61

PB Ratio

FOSL:

0.70

CFRUY:

4.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOSL:

$995.91M

CFRUY:

€43.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOSL:

$554.81M

CFRUY:

€28.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

FOSL:

$11.41M

CFRUY:

€10.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSL vs. CFRUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSL
FOSL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FOSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CFRUY
CFRUY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CFRUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFRUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFRUY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CFRUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFRUY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Compagnie Financiere Richemont (CFRUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSLCFRUYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.15

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

0.91

+3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

2.46

+8.22

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the CFRUY Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSL and CFRUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSL drawdown since its inception was -99.44%, which is greater than CFRUY's maximum drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSL and CFRUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSLCFRUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.44%

-48.02%

-51.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.27%

-25.50%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.90%

-33.55%

-39.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.42%

-39.18%

-56.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.88%

-48.02%

-49.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.10%

-4.26%

-92.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.02%

-14.72%

-34.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.62%

9.48%

+10.14%

Volatility

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Volatility Comparison

Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to Compagnie Financiere Richemont (CFRUY) at 10.46%. This indicates that FOSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFRUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSLCFRUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.01%

10.46%

+5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.54%

25.28%

+22.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.67%

31.65%

+69.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.89%

36.18%

+52.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.69%

33.05%

+62.64%

Dividends

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Dividend Comparison

FOSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CFRUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFRUY
Compagnie Financiere Richemont
1.68%1.72%2.13%2.86%2.57%1.45%1.17%1.49%1.76%1.19%4.42%2.53%
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fossil Group, Inc. and Compagnie Financiere Richemont. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
224.80M
11.96B
(FOSL) Total Revenue
(CFRUY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FOSL values in USD, CFRUY values in EUR

FOSL vs. CFRUY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fossil Group, Inc. and Compagnie Financiere Richemont over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
59.9%
63.6%
Portfolio components
FOSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 134.70M and revenue of 224.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

CFRUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compagnie Financiere Richemont reported a gross profit of 7.60B and revenue of 11.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

FOSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.00M and revenue of 224.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

CFRUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compagnie Financiere Richemont reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 11.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

FOSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported a net income of -800.00K and revenue of 224.80M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

CFRUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compagnie Financiere Richemont reported a net income of 1.69B and revenue of 11.96B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FOSL and CFRUY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOSL has higher volatility (16.01%) compared to CFRUY (10.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSL dropped -99.44% vs CFRUY's -48.02%.

FOSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSL and CFRUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer