PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOON vs. GGTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOON vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MOON

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGTL

1D
-4.64%
1M
2.58%
YTD
23.84%
6M
23.84%
1Y
40.67%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOON vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MOON
Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%-8.56%9.85%-61.01%
GGTL
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
23.84%19.78%11.07%18.17%-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MOON and GGTL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022

0.50

The correlation between MOON and GGTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOON vs. GGTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOON
GGTL

Technology

42.4%
55.5%

Healthcare

23.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
0.9%

Communication Services

9.3%
2.9%

Industrials

7.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MOON
42.4%
GGTL
55.5%

Healthcare

MOON
23.5%
GGTL

-

Consumer Cyclical

MOON
11.9%
GGTL
0.9%

Communication Services

MOON
9.3%
GGTL
2.9%

Industrials

MOON
7.5%
GGTL
0.1%

Financial Services

MOON
4.2%
GGTL

-

Basic Materials

MOON
1.2%
GGTL

-

Consumer Defensive

MOON

-

GGTL

-

Energy

MOON

-

GGTL

-

Real Estate

MOON

-

GGTL

-

Utilities

MOON

-

GGTL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOON vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GGTL
GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOON vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOONGGTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

MOON vs. GGTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOON vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOONGGTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

Volatility

MOON vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOONGGTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

MOON vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOON has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOON vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison

MOON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GGTL
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
0.84%1.04%0.75%0.84%0.78%0.00%
MOON
Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.62%1.41%0.00%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOON and GGTL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOON is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOON is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for MOON.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for MOON and 0.90% for GGTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOON and GGTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer