MOON vs. CRTC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MOON (Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - MOON tracks the S&P Kensho Moonshots Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOON charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

MOON vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MOON

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 3.88%
• YTD: 6.92%
• 1Y: 14.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOON vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MOON Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-8.56%	15.95%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	6.92%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MOON and CRTC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.21

MOON vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOON	CRTC
Technology	42.4%	39.5%
Healthcare	23.5%	12.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	5.4%
Communication Services	9.3%	15.0%
Industrials	7.5%	12.6%
Financial Services	4.2%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.2%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

MOON vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 39
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOON vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOON	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.49	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MOON	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.07%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.79%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.20%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOON	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.82%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.82%	—

MOON vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOON has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOON vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

MOON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.89%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
MOON Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.41%	0.00%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOON and CRTC in my portfolio?

MOON and CRTC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOON or CRTC?

On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOON or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MOON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOON or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for MOON.

What is the main difference between MOON and CRTC?

MOON tracks S&P Kensho Moonshots Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for MOON and 0.35% for CRTC.