MOOD vs. XBOX

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and XBOX (Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment, while XBOX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOOD charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XBOX.

Performance

MOOD vs. XBOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MOOD

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -2.03%
• 6M: 6.31%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 1Y: 30.11%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.16%

XBOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. XBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	3.95%
XBOX Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and XBOX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026	0.13

Return for Risk

MOOD vs. XBOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 79
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 71

XBOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. XBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOOD	XBOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	—	—

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. XBOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than XBOX's maximum drawdown of -0.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and XBOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOOD	XBOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-0.83%	-13.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	0.00%	-2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-0.08%	-2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOOD	XBOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	2.04%	+12.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.11%	2.04%	+10.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.11%	2.04%	+10.07%

MOOD vs. XBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than XBOX's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOOD vs. XBOX - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while XBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.36%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%
XBOX Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOOD and XBOX in my portfolio?

MOOD and XBOX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOOD or XBOX?

On fees, XBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOOD or XBOX?

XBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOOD or XBOX?

MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for XBOX.

What is the main difference between MOOD and XBOX?

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while XBOX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MOOD and 0.14% for XBOX.