PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOOD vs. USDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOOD vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than USDX's 2.26% return.


MOOD

1D
0.41%
1M
1.18%
YTD
14.12%
6M
15.59%
1Y
33.44%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10Y*

USDX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.59%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
14.12%30.39%9.94%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
2.26%6.25%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and USDX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

-0.01

MOOD vs. USDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOOD
USDX

Technology

27.6%

-

Financial Services

15.7%
84.7%

Industrials

12.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Communication Services

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

MOOD
27.6%
USDX

-

Financial Services

MOOD
15.7%
USDX
84.7%

Industrials

MOOD
12.6%
USDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

MOOD
9.5%
USDX

-

Healthcare

MOOD
8.4%
USDX

-

Communication Services

MOOD
7.9%
USDX

-

Consumer Defensive

MOOD
5.1%
USDX

-

Basic Materials

MOOD
4.4%
USDX

-

Energy

MOOD
3.7%
USDX

-

Utilities

MOOD
2.7%
USDX

-

Real Estate

MOOD
2.5%
USDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOOD vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

USDX
USDX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOODUSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.81

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

6.93

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

45.42

-34.74

MOOD vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and USDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOODUSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-0.94%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-0.94%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.18%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-0.06%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

0.14%

+3.00%

Volatility

MOOD vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) at 1.04%. This indicates that MOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOODUSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

1.04%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

1.82%

+10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

2.01%

+12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.13%

1.71%

+10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.13%

1.71%

+10.42%

MOOD vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOOD vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than USDX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.35%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
5.88%5.88%4.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOOD and USDX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOOD has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to USDX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs USDX's -0.94%.

On 1-year performance, MOOD leads with 33.44% vs 6.47% for USDX. On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, USDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 33.44% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOOD is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 0.35% for MOOD.

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while USDX is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 0.98% for USDX.

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOOD and USDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer