MOOD vs. QAITX

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX).

MOOD is an actively managed fund by Relative Sentiment. It was launched on May 18, 2022. QAITX is managed by Q3 Asset Management Corporation. It was launched on Dec 29, 2019.

Performance

MOOD vs. QAITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MOOD vs. QAITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	6.88%	30.39%	12.53%	12.56%	-2.90%
QAITX Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund	-6.83%	3.53%	16.11%	23.71%	-15.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than QAITX's -6.83% return.

MOOD

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 6M: 13.05%
• 1Y: 31.65%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QAITX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: -6.83%
• 6M: -6.38%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 9.58%
• 5Y*: -0.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. QAITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QAITX's 1.36% expense ratio.

QAITX

Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

MOOD vs. QAITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 90
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 86

QAITX

QAITX Risk / Return Rank: 8
QAITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
QAITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
QAITX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
QAITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
QAITX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. QAITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOOD	QAITX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	0.30	+1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	0.49	+2.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.06	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	0.35	+2.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	1.32	+10.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOOD vs. QAITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the QAITX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and QAITX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOOD	QAITX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	0.30	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.27	+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and QAITX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MOOD vs. QAITX - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than QAITX's 1.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%
QAITX Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund	1.00%	1.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.77%	7.57%

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. QAITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum QAITX drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and QAITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOOD	QAITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-40.35%	+26.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-13.49%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.15%	-15.66%	+8.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-15.90%	+13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	3.60%	-0.84%

Volatility

MOOD vs. QAITX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 4.33%, while Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOOD	QAITX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	6.27%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	12.62%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	14.06%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.16%	13.43%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.16%	14.67%	-2.51%