PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOOD vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOOD vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.89% return.


MOOD

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.03%
6M
6.31%
YTD
12.81%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.16%

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.73%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
12.81%30.39%-1.53%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
1.89%4.13%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and MMKT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOOD vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOODMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-60.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

16.03

-14.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

150.42

-147.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

907.31

-897.85

MOOD vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOODMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-0.04%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-0.02%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

0.00%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-0.00%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

0.00%

+3.19%

Volatility

MOOD vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that MOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOODMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

0.05%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

0.13%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

0.22%

+14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

0.23%

+11.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

0.23%

+11.88%

MOOD vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOOD vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than MMKT's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.67%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.36%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOOD and MMKT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOOD has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, MOOD leads with 30.11% vs 3.74% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 30.11% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MOOD and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.79 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOOD and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer