MOOD vs. MAIN
MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) is Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment, while MAIN (Main Street Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MOOD returned 20.20%/yr vs 18.74%/yr for MAIN. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOOD vs. MAIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than MAIN's -10.97% return.
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 34.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAIN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -12.92%
- 1Y
- -3.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
MOOD vs. MAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 14.12% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -3.31% |
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | -10.97% | 10.74% | 47.30% | 28.22% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOOD and MAIN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.45 |
The correlation between MOOD and MAIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOOD vs. MAIN — Risk / Return Rank
MOOD
MAIN
MOOD vs. MAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOOD | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.99 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | -0.18 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | -0.35 | +11.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOOD vs. MAIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum MAIN drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and MAIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOOD | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -64.53% | +50.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -22.43% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -22.43% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -18.28% | +17.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -7.31% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 11.18% | -8.04% |
Volatility
MOOD vs. MAIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 4.19%, while Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOOD | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 5.82% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 20.12% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 24.84% | -10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 21.57% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 27.30% | -15.17% |
Dividends
MOOD vs. MAIN - Dividend Comparison
MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than MAIN's 8.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | 8.25% | 7.00% | 7.02% | 8.55% | 7.97% | 5.74% | 6.99% | 6.76% | 8.43% | 7.49% | 7.42% | 9.15% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOOD and MAIN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAIN has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to MOOD (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs MAIN's -64.53%.
MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOOD and MAIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer