MON100.NS vs. IVV
MON100.NS (Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MON100.NS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MON100.NS returned 27.88%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for IVV. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MON100.NS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MON100.NS achieves a 47.10% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MON100.NS has outperformed IVV with an annualized return of 27.88%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.53% annualized return.
MON100.NS
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 12.11%
- YTD
- 47.10%
- 6M
- 45.21%
- 1Y
- 88.63%
- 3Y*
- 43.35%
- 5Y*
- 28.48%
- 10Y*
- 27.88%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 28.64%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | 47.10% | 8.64% | 56.36% | 53.45% | -26.09% | 30.21% | 50.75% | 39.89% | -9.38% | 36.62% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.38% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MON100.NS and IVV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011 | 0.06 |
The correlation between MON100.NS and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MON100.NS vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
MON100.NS
IVV
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MON100.NS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.44 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.01 | 3.24 | +3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.11 | 15.05 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MON100.NS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.42 | 2.44 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.41 | 0.83 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.45 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MON100.NS drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MON100.NS and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MON100.NS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -55.25% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -8.89% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.76% | -18.75% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.34% | -24.53% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -33.90% | -2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.29% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -10.78% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 1.91% | +3.09% |
Volatility
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.83%. This indicates that MON100.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MON100.NS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 2.83% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 8.90% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 11.80% | +8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 16.88% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 18.05% | +5.12% |
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MON100.NS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MON100.NS vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
MON100.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MON100.NS and IVV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MON100.NS.
MON100.NS is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IVV is S&P 500. MON100.NS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Motilal Oswal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MON100.NS and 0.03% for IVV.
Find the right allocation for MON100.NS and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer