PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOJOX vs. HSAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOJOX achieves a 38.08% return, which is significantly higher than HSAFX's -1.90% return.


MOJOX

1D
0.21%
1M
6.32%
YTD
38.08%
6M
38.63%
1Y
57.57%
3Y*
32.82%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*

HSAFX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
-1.33%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
38.08%22.91%22.29%19.10%-22.78%28.86%-1.95%-0.97%
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
-1.90%7.78%1.74%0.65%4.42%7.23%11.20%-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MOJOX and HSAFX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019

0.21

The correlation between MOJOX and HSAFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOJOX vs. HSAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOJOX
MOJOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MOJOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOJOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOJOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MOJOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOJOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HSAFX
HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOJOXHSAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

0.97

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.08

-0.22

+7.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.70

-0.63

+28.33

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOJOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the HSAFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOJOX and HSAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOJOXHSAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

-0.21

+3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.36

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Drawdowns

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOJOX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, which is greater than HSAFX's maximum drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOJOX and HSAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOJOXHSAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-5.54%

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-5.34%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.50%

-5.34%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-5.54%

-19.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.15%

+4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-1.56%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.89%

+0.19%

Volatility

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) at 1.70%. This indicates that MOJOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOJOXHSAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

1.70%

+4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

3.68%

+12.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

5.59%

+13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

4.86%

+12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

5.12%

+10.97%

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOJOX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOJOX vs. HSAFX - Dividend Comparison

MOJOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.43%, more than HSAFX's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
1.80%1.90%2.15%1.60%19.12%3.37%5.55%0.03%0.00%0.00%
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
19.43%26.83%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.49%5.78%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOJOX and HSAFX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOJOX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to HSAFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOJOX dropped -28.85% vs HSAFX's -5.54%.

MOJOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOJOX and HSAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer