MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L
MOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from VanEck tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOGB.L returned 4.31%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for MOAT.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MOGB.L is traded in GBP, while MOAT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOGB.L achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT.L's -2.30% return.
MOGB.L
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- 9.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT.L
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -3.80%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOGB.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | -2.45% | 0.00% | 12.94% | 11.88% | -9.07% | 27.24% | 9.78% | 29.63% | 3.53% | 4.34% |
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | -2.30% | -0.31% | 13.06% | 12.45% | -9.03% | 26.72% | 10.28% | 28.71% | 3.71% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOGB.L and MOAT.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MOGB.L and MOAT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank
MOGB.L
MOAT.L
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOGB.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 2.02 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOGB.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.69 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.73 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOGB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.07%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT.L drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOGB.L and MOAT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOGB.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -25.07% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -10.93% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.73% | -23.01% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.73% | -23.01% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -6.70% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -4.46% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.62% | -0.08% |
Volatility
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) is 3.24%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that MOGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOGB.L | MOAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.71% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 9.67% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 13.50% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 15.60% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 16.94% | -0.74% |
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MOGB.L and MOAT.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
MOGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MOGB.L nor MOAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MOGB.L and MOAT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MOGB.L and MOAT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD.
Find the right allocation for MOGB.L and MOAT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer