PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 13.47%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.86% annualized return.


MOAT

1D
0.41%
1M
3.44%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.47%

VOOG

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.61%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
17.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.66%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.67%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and VOOG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between MOAT and VOOG has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOAT vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOAT
VOOG

Technology

32.8%
49.4%

Consumer Defensive

17.5%
1.0%

Healthcare

16.0%
5.8%

Industrials

13.5%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

6.7%
8.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
18.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Energy

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

MOAT
32.8%
VOOG
49.4%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
17.5%
VOOG
1.0%

Healthcare

MOAT
16.0%
VOOG
5.8%

Industrials

MOAT
13.5%
VOOG
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
10.3%
VOOG
9.4%

Financial Services

MOAT
6.7%
VOOG
8.8%

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
VOOG
18.0%

Real Estate

MOAT
0.8%
VOOG
0.6%

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

VOOG
0.4%

Energy

MOAT

-

VOOG
0.1%

Utilities

MOAT

-

VOOG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOATVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.02

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

8.11

-5.00

MOAT vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, roughly equal to the maximum VOOG drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-32.73%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-13.71%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-22.18%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-32.73%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-32.73%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-4.65%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-4.97%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

3.40%

+0.66%

Volatility

MOAT vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.13%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

6.29%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

13.43%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

16.60%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

21.29%

-3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

20.78%

-2.10%

MOAT vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VOOG's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and VOOG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 13.47% for MOAT. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.07% for VOOG.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer