MOAT vs. VNQ
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOAT returned 13.35%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for VNQ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.
Performance
MOAT vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 11.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 13.35%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- 12.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
MOAT vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -1.06% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and VNQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MOAT and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOAT vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOAT
VNQ
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MOAT
VNQ
Consumer Defensive
MOAT
VNQ
-
Healthcare
MOAT
VNQ
-
Industrials
MOAT
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
MOAT
VNQ
-
Financial Services
MOAT
VNQ
Communication Services
MOAT
VNQ
Real Estate
MOAT
VNQ
Basic Materials
MOAT
-
VNQ
Energy
MOAT
-
VNQ
Utilities
MOAT
-
VNQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
VNQ
MOAT vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOAT | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.50 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 4.71 | -1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -73.07% | +39.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -8.34% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | -17.46% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | -34.48% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -42.40% | +9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -0.49% | -4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -13.61% | +9.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.65% | +1.40% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.16%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.74% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 9.74% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 13.52% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 18.85% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 20.72% | -2.03% |
MOAT vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than VNQ's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and VNQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to MOAT (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.35% vs 5.53% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.
MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VNQ is REIT. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.13% for VNQ.
VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer