PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOAT vs. SEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOAT vs. SEMA.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOAT returned 13.34%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for SEMA.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SEMA.L.

Performance

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MOAT is traded in USD, while SEMA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than SEMA.L's 20.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed SEMA.L with an annualized return of 13.34%, while SEMA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.

MOAT

1D
-1.39%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
13.48%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
13.34%

SEMA.L

1D
-4.48%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.92%
1Y
44.50%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		-1.46%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		20.10%34.53%7.56%8.93%-20.28%-2.49%18.20%17.14%-14.38%36.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and SEMA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.48

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOAT
SEMA.L

Technology

32.8%
42.9%

Consumer Defensive

17.5%
2.7%

Healthcare

16.0%
2.6%

Industrials

13.5%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
8.6%

Financial Services

6.7%
17.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

5.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Technology

MOAT
32.8%
SEMA.L
42.9%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
17.5%
SEMA.L
2.7%

Healthcare

MOAT
16.0%
SEMA.L
2.6%

Industrials

MOAT
13.5%
SEMA.L
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
10.3%
SEMA.L
8.6%

Financial Services

MOAT
6.7%
SEMA.L
17.8%

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
SEMA.L
6.2%

Real Estate

MOAT
0.8%
SEMA.L
1.0%

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

SEMA.L
5.9%

Energy

MOAT

-

SEMA.L
3.5%

Utilities

MOAT

-

SEMA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with MOAT:
MOAT vs. SPYMOAT vs. VOOMOAT vs. BRK-AMOAT vs. SCHDMOAT vs. IVVMOAT vs. VTIMOAT vs. IOO
Often compared with SEMA.L:
SEMA.L vs. EMIM.LSEMA.L vs. EIMI.LSEMA.L vs. VFEG.LSEMA.L vs. VWRA.LSEMA.L vs. SWRD.MISEMA.L vs. EQQQ.LSEMA.L vs. EDIV

Return for Risk

MOAT vs. SEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOATSEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.06
2.27

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.59
2.99

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

3.41

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

12.49

-8.83

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and SEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOATSEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.27

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.28

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.44

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.07

+0.70

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum SEMA.L drawdown of -53.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and SEMA.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOATSEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-53.58%

+20.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-12.96%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-21.27%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-36.87%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-39.72%

+6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-7.03%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-27.57%

+23.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

3.54%

+0.46%

Volatility

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.05%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.91%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOATSEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

8.91%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

16.97%

-7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

19.46%

-5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

23.04%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

21.64%

-2.95%

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOAT vs. SEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		1.38%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOAT and SEMA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.18% for SEMA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and SEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer