PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 13.37%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


MOAT

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
13.37%

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.94%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and SCHB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.88

The correlation between MOAT and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOAT
SCHB

Technology

32.8%
34.4%

Consumer Defensive

17.5%
4.6%

Healthcare

16.0%
8.9%

Industrials

13.5%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.1%

Financial Services

6.7%
12.2%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.1%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

MOAT
32.8%
SCHB
34.4%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
17.5%
SCHB
4.6%

Healthcare

MOAT
16.0%
SCHB
8.9%

Industrials

MOAT
13.5%
SCHB
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
10.3%
SCHB
10.1%

Financial Services

MOAT
6.7%
SCHB
12.2%

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
SCHB
10.1%

Real Estate

MOAT
0.8%
SCHB
2.4%

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

SCHB
2.0%

Energy

MOAT

-

SCHB
3.7%

Utilities

MOAT

-

SCHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOATSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.17

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

14.55

-10.77

MOAT vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOATSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.33

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.74

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.82

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-35.27%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-8.91%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-19.34%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-25.41%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-35.27%

+1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-0.72%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-4.12%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

1.94%

+2.04%

Volatility

MOAT vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.01%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

9.14%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

12.12%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.24%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

18.32%

+0.36%

MOAT vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and SCHB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.04% vs 13.37% for MOAT. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer