MOAT vs. BUFX
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
MOAT vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 4.10% return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.07% | 13.62% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and BUFX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
BUFX
MOAT vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 2.68 | -1.91 |
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -2.87% | -30.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -0.07% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -0.24% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility
MOAT vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 3.98% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 3.98% | +14.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 3.98% | +14.70% |
MOAT vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and BUFX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer