MOAT vs. BUFX
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, MOAT returned 11.95% vs 9.40% for BUFX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
MOAT vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 3.77% return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 9.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -1.37% | 13.51% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 3.77% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and BUFX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
BUFX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MOAT vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -2.87% | -30.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -2.87% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.14% | -0.65% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -0.25% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | — | — |
Volatility
MOAT vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 4.04% | +9.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 4.04% | +14.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 4.04% | +14.61% |
MOAT vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and BUFX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, MOAT leads with 11.95% vs 9.40% for BUFX. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer