PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT.L vs. VPN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than VPN.L's 29.81% return.


MOAT.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.53%
6M
-1.16%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
10.71%

VPN.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
-13.39%
6M
16.18%
YTD
29.81%
1Y
44.32%
3Y*
26.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.42%7.34%11.12%18.37%-18.70%4.51%
VPN.L
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
29.81%29.31%13.54%17.68%-30.40%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT.L and VPN.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between MOAT.L and VPN.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT.L
MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VPN.L
VPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOAT.LVPN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.87

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

8.60

-6.98

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the VPN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT.L and VPN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT.L drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum VPN.L drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT.L and VPN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOAT.LVPN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-38.80%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-15.39%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

-25.58%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-15.39%

+13.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-14.64%

+9.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

5.14%

-0.39%

Volatility

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) is 4.72%, while Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPN.L) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that MOAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOAT.LVPN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

7.36%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

17.63%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

23.60%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

22.63%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

22.63%

-5.79%

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than VPN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT.L vs. VPN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MOAT.L nor VPN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT.L and VPN.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOAT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOAT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.L.

MOAT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VPN.L is REIT. MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VPN.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MOAT.L and 0.50% for VPN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT.L and VPN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer