PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than LGUS.L's 9.01% return.


MOAT.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.53%
6M
-1.16%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
10.71%

LGUS.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.36%
6M
8.07%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.42%7.34%11.12%18.37%-18.70%25.53%13.62%33.78%-8.68%
LGUS.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.01%17.98%25.09%28.66%-20.46%27.91%21.16%30.91%-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT.L and LGUS.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between MOAT.L and LGUS.L has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT.L
MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUS.L
LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOAT.LLGUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.30

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

8.84

-7.23

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT.L drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT.L and LGUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOAT.LLGUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-34.26%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-8.58%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

-19.46%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-25.64%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.69%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-5.29%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

2.23%

+2.52%

Volatility

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that MOAT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOAT.LLGUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.15%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

9.50%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

12.53%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

16.52%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

18.10%

-1.26%

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MOAT.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT.L and LGUS.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.

MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MOAT.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT.L and LGUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer