PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MO vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MO vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 26.86% return, which is significantly higher than UTG's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MO has underperformed UTG with an annualized return of 7.93%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


MO

1D
0.74%
1M
0.56%
YTD
26.86%
6M
26.78%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
7.93%

UTG

1D
1.59%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.46%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MO vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
26.86%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%24.18%-10.21%7.87%-27.14%9.45%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
13.63%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MO and UTG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2004

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between MO and UTG has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MO:

$120.36B

UTG:

$3.66B

EPS

MO:

$4.79

UTG:

$18.20

PE Ratio

MO:

15.00

UTG:

2.24

PEG Ratio

MO:

0.32

UTG:

0.01

PS Ratio

MO:

5.54

UTG:

6.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

MO:

$21.82B

UTG:

$525.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MO:

$14.80B

UTG:

$228.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

MO:

$11.70B

UTG:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MO vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MO vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOUTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.04

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

4.45

-0.06

MO vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MO Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MO and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MO vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, roughly equal to the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.43%

-67.77%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-11.59%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-15.03%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

-26.54%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.69%

-47.91%

-5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-6.18%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-8.74%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

5.31%

+1.19%

Volatility

MO vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) at 6.31%. This indicates that MO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

6.31%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.60%

13.12%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

16.96%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

16.87%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

21.61%

+1.36%

Dividends

MO vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, which matches UTG's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.84%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.86%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Financials

MO vs. UTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altria Group, Inc. and Reaves Utility Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.43B
76.73M
(MO) Total Revenue
(UTG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MO and UTG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MO has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to UTG (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs UTG's -67.77%.

UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MO and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer