MO vs. META

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MO (Altria Group, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. MO operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MO returned 8.10%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for META. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MO vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 27.30% return, which is significantly higher than META's -10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MO has underperformed META with an annualized return of 8.10%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.64% annualized return.

MO

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 27.30%
• 6M: 28.89%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 26.90%
• 5Y*: 16.44%
• 10Y*: 8.10%

META

• 1D: -5.51%
• 1M: -3.24%
• YTD: -10.09%
• 6M: -11.79%
• 1Y: -13.11%
• 3Y*: 30.15%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: 17.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MO vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MO Altria Group, Inc.	27.30%	18.17%	40.76%	-3.70%	4.37%	24.18%	-10.21%	7.87%	-27.14%	9.45%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-10.09%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MO and META is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.10

The correlation between MO and META shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MO : $120.77B META : $1.52T
EPS MO : $4.79 META : $27.47
PE Ratio MO : 15.06 META : 21.59
PEG Ratio MO : 0.32 META : 0.89
PS Ratio MO : 5.56 META : 7.09
Total Revenue (TTM) MO : $21.82B META : $214.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) MO : $14.80B META : $176.14B
EBITDA (TTM) MO : $11.70B META : $106.31B

Return for Risk

MO vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MO

MO Risk / Return Rank: 74
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 25
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
META Omega Ratio Rank: 24
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
META Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MO vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MO	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	-0.37	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	-0.31	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.96	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	-0.40	+2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	-0.84	+5.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MO vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MO and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MO	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	-0.37	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.29	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.46	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.55	+0.15

Drawdowns

MO vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	MO	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.43%	-76.74%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-33.30%	+16.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.40%	-34.15%	+17.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.83%	-76.74%	+50.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.69%	-76.74%	+23.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.17%	-24.76%	+21.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-15.26%	+3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.48%	15.60%	-9.12%

Volatility

MO vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is 6.78%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that MO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MO	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	10.46%	-3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.26%	27.14%	-9.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.45%	35.52%	-13.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.64%	44.04%	-23.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.95%	38.68%	-15.73%

Dividends

MO vs. META - Dividend Comparison

MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than META's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.35%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MO Altria Group, Inc.	5.82%	7.21%	7.65%	9.52%	8.05%	7.43%	8.29%	6.57%	6.07%	3.56%	3.48%	3.73%

Financials

MO vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Altria Group, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MO and META in my portfolio?

MO and META have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MO or META?

META has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to MO (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.