MO vs. LEG
MO (Altria Group, Inc.) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. MO operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MO returned 7.50%/yr vs -11.28%/yr for LEG. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MO vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 28.49% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MO has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 7.50%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.28% annualized return.
MO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 28.78%
- YTD
- 28.49%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 25.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
LEG
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- -10.27%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.47%
- 10Y*
- -11.28%
MO vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 28.49% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -3.70% | 4.37% | 24.18% | -10.21% | 7.87% | -27.14% | 9.45% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 0.42% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MO and LEG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.22 |
The correlation between MO and LEG shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MO:
$119.85B
LEG:
$1.49B
MO:
$4.80
LEG:
$1.60
MO:
14.96
LEG:
6.85
MO:
5.52
LEG:
0.51
MO:
$21.82B
LEG:
$3.03B
MO:
$14.80B
LEG:
$717.40M
MO:
$11.70B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MO vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
MO
LEG
MO vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MO | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 0.28 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 0.57 | +4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MO vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MO | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.43% | -86.41% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -28.51% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.40% | -76.78% | +60.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -84.29% | +58.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.69% | -86.41% | +32.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -76.78% | +73.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -19.76% | +7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 14.12% | -7.61% |
Volatility
MO vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is 7.15%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that MO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MO | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 10.79% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 31.85% | -13.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 49.11% | -26.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 42.59% | -21.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 39.87% | -16.83% |
Dividends
MO vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than LEG's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.83% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 5.91% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
Financials
MO vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altria Group, Inc. and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MO and LEG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to MO (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs LEG's -86.41%.
MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MO and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer