MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MNU-U.TO (Purpose USD Cash Management ETF) and HSUV-U.TO (Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNU-U.TO is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while HSUV-U.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MNU-U.TO returned 3.61%/yr vs 4.59%/yr for HSUV-U.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNU-U.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSUV-U.TO.

Performance

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) and Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNU-U.TO achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than HSUV-U.TO's 1.49% return.

MNU-U.TO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HSUV-U.TO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF	1.14%	2.98%	4.23%	2.87%
HSUV-U.TO Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF	1.49%	4.04%	4.86%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MNU-U.TO and HSUV-U.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2023	0.06

Return for Risk

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNU-U.TO

MNU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
MNU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MNU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MNU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MNU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MNU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

HSUV-U.TO

HSUV-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
HSUV-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
HSUV-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HSUV-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
HSUV-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HSUV-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) and Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNU-U.TO	HSUV-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.16	3.25	+3.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.86	4.90	+4.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.65	1.76	+1.89
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	17.71	10.98	+6.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	96.29	35.36	+60.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 7.16, which is higher than the HSUV-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNU-U.TO and HSUV-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNU-U.TO	HSUV-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.16	3.25	+3.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	3.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.01	3.47	+2.53

Drawdowns

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.43%, smaller than the maximum HSUV-U.TO drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNU-U.TO and HSUV-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNU-U.TO	HSUV-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-0.52%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.16%	-0.34%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.43%	-0.52%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.03%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.04%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.11%	-0.08%

Volatility

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) is 0.09%, while Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that MNU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSUV-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNU-U.TO	HSUV-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	0.48%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.28%	0.89%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40%	1.16%	-0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.61%	0.96%	-0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.61%	0.88%	-0.27%

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNU-U.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUV-U.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MNU-U.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

MNU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while HSUV-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HSUV-U.TO Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF	2.79%	2.98%	4.25%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNU-U.TO and HSUV-U.TO in my portfolio?

MNU-U.TO and HSUV-U.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNU-U.TO or HSUV-U.TO?

On fees, HSUV-U.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNU-U.TO or HSUV-U.TO?

HSUV-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MNU-U.TO.

What is the main difference between MNU-U.TO and HSUV-U.TO?

MNU-U.TO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while HSUV-U.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MNU-U.TO and 0.18% for HSUV-U.TO.