PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO).

HSUV-U.TO and HISA.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HSUV-U.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. HISA.NEO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Nov 19, 2019.

Performance

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSUV-U.TO
Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF		0.86%4.04%4.86%5.46%1.94%0.27%0.14%
HISA.NEO
Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF		0.61%7.20%-4.42%7.04%-4.56%1.26%6.77%
Different Trading Currencies

HSUV-U.TO is traded in USD, while HISA.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HISA.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSUV-U.TO achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than HISA.NEO's 0.61% return.

HSUV-U.TO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.84%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
—

HISA.NEO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.76%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF

Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF

Often compared with HSUV-U.TO:
HSUV-U.TO vs. HISU-U.TOHSUV-U.TO vs. CMNY.TOHSUV-U.TO vs. TBIL.TOHSUV-U.TO vs. CSAV.TOHSUV-U.TO vs. CASH.TOHSUV-U.TO vs. PSA.TOHSUV-U.TO vs. CBIL.TO
Often compared with HISA.NEO:
HISA.NEO vs. ZMMK.TOHISA.NEO vs. CASH.TOHISA.NEO vs. PSA.TOHISA.NEO vs. HISU-U.TOHISA.NEO vs. TECH.TOHISA.NEO vs. OILY.TOHISA.NEO vs. CMNY.TO

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSUV-U.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HISA.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

HSUV-U.TO
Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
HISA.NEO
Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF

Return for Risk

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HSUV-U.TO
HSUV-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HSUV-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUV-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUV-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUV-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUV-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO
HISA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HSUV-U.TOHISA.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.87

1.42

+2.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.30

2.32

+3.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.28

+0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.59

2.48

+13.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

48.24

5.79

+42.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSUV-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the HISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSUV-U.TO and HISA.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HSUV-U.TOHISA.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87

1.42

+2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.77

0.16

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.54

0.30

+3.24

Correlation

The correlation between HSUV-U.TO and HISA.NEO is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HSUV-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HISA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HSUV-U.TO
Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HISA.NEO
Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF		2.35%2.32%3.65%4.60%2.22%0.52%0.84%0.76%

Drawdowns

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSUV-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum HISA.NEO drawdown of -11.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUV-U.TO and HISA.NEO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HSUV-U.TOHISA.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-0.42%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-0.18%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.52%

-0.42%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.01%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.02%

+0.06%

Volatility

HSUV-U.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X USD Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSUV-U.TO) is 0.32%, while Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that HSUV-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HISA.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HSUV-U.TOHISA.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

1.68%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.82%

3.29%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03%

5.28%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.92%

6.45%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

6.79%

-5.93%