PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNTRX vs. SSHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than SSHIX's 0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed SSHIX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while SSHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.65% annualized return.


MNTRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.18%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.43%

SSHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
0.29%7.16%1.38%5.37%-13.82%-2.10%8.51%8.18%-0.57%3.28%
SSHIX
Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund
0.61%5.59%5.41%6.19%-4.87%0.16%6.02%4.80%1.41%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MNTRX and SSHIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2000

0.68

The correlation between MNTRX and SSHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNTRX vs. SSHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNTRX
MNTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MNTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MNTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHIX
SSHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SSHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNTRXSSHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.86

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.99

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

12.80

-7.52

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SSHIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNTRX and SSHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNTRXSSHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

3.08

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

1.17

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

1.43

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.56

-0.64

Drawdowns

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, which is greater than SSHIX's maximum drawdown of -7.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and SSHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNTRXSSHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-7.13%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-1.39%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.27%

-1.39%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-7.13%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.36%

-7.13%

-12.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-0.29%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-0.62%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.32%

+0.68%

Volatility

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX) at 0.45%. This indicates that MNTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNTRXSSHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

0.45%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

1.02%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

1.35%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

2.07%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

1.86%

+3.10%

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SSHIX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNTRX vs. SSHIX - Dividend Comparison

MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than SSHIX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
4.06%4.07%4.13%3.19%1.85%1.75%6.35%2.46%2.33%1.74%1.97%1.45%
SSHIX
Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund
4.20%4.27%4.43%3.92%1.92%2.31%3.14%2.61%2.21%1.65%1.58%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNTRX and SSHIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNTRX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to SSHIX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTRX dropped -19.36% vs SSHIX's -7.13%.

SSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNTRX and SSHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer