MNTN vs. MAGS
MNTN (Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, MNTN returned -55.00% vs 20.86% for MAGS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNTN vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTN achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 1.56% return.
MNTN
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 20.16%
- 6M
- -13.44%
- YTD
- -12.65%
- 1Y
- -55.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 30.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNTN vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNTN Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation | -12.65% | -43.14% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.56% | 30.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTN and MAGS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNTN vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
MNTN
MAGS
MNTN vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation (MNTN) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNTN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.18 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.13 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 3.48 | -4.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNTN vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTN drawdown since its inception was -75.28%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTN and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.28% | -29.91% | -45.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.28% | -18.62% | -56.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.86% | -5.57% | -61.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.11% | -4.81% | -46.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.75% | 6.01% | +52.74% |
Volatility
MNTN vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation (MNTN) has a higher volatility of 24.97% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 7.85%. This indicates that MNTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNTN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.97% | 7.85% | +17.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.17% | 16.45% | +44.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.65% | 21.23% | +57.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.69% | 26.01% | +59.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.69% | 26.01% | +59.68% |
Dividends
MNTN vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
MNTN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.46% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
MNTN Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNTN and MAGS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNTN has higher volatility (24.97%) compared to MAGS (7.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTN dropped -75.28% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNTN and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer