MNTN vs. MAGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation (MNTN) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS).
MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023.
Performance
MNTN vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNTN vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNTN Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation | -26.30% | -54.70% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -12.16% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTN achieves a -26.30% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's -12.16% return.
MNTN
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -26.30%
- 6M
- -52.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 4.60%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -12.16%
- 6M
- -9.36%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNTN vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
MNTN
MAGS
MNTN vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation (MNTN) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNTN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.90 | 1.34 | -2.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTN and MAGS is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNTN vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
MNTN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTN Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.68% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
MNTN vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTN drawdown since its inception was -74.96%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTN and MAGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.96% | -29.91% | -45.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.04% | -14.87% | -57.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.04% | -4.75% | -40.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.29% | — |
Volatility
MNTN vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNTN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.14% | 28.68% | +52.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.14% | 26.29% | +54.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.14% | 26.29% | +54.85% |