PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNT.TO achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than ARTG.V's -14.96% return.


MNT.TO

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.86%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
32.67%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
13.75%

ARTG.V

1D
-4.38%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
-14.96%
6M
-12.11%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
87.54%
5Y*
36.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
-0.92%61.23%44.81%3.61%10.52%-10.51%26.14%-3.82%
ARTG.V
Artemis Gold Inc
-14.96%166.84%117.56%43.96%-36.38%7.81%392.31%30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MNT.TO and ARTG.V is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2019

0.26

Over the past year, MNT.TO and ARTG.V have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ARTG.V
ARTG.V Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNT.TOARTG.VDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.79

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

1.96

+1.17

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNT.TO and ARTG.V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNT.TOARTG.VDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.54

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.71

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.14

-0.71

Drawdowns

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum ARTG.V drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNT.TO and ARTG.V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNT.TOARTG.VDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-54.31%

+19.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.01%

-32.89%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-32.89%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-54.31%

+29.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.04%

-32.89%

+11.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-17.31%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.46%

13.15%

-3.69%

Volatility

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) is 5.13%, while Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that MNT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARTG.V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNT.TOARTG.VDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

14.01%

-8.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.08%

36.29%

-11.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.12%

47.40%

-17.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

51.19%

-30.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

59.49%

-39.92%

Dividends

MNT.TO vs. ARTG.V - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNT.TO nor ARTG.V has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MNT.TO and ARTG.V have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNT.TO and ARTG.V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer