PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNRS vs. IREG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNRS vs. IREG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS achieves a 66.15% return, which is significantly lower than IREG's 76.42% return.


MNRS

1D
-2.00%
1M
35.90%
YTD
66.15%
6M
40.56%
1Y
129.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IREG

1D
-3.13%
1M
56.03%
YTD
76.42%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
66.15%-2.36%
IREG
Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF
76.42%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS and IREG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNRS vs. IREG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRS
MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IREG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNRSIREGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

MNRS vs. IREG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNRSIREGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.33

-0.48

Drawdowns

MNRS vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum IREG drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS and IREG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNRSIREGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-80.08%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-29.69%

+21.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-44.09%

+20.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.93%

Volatility

MNRS vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNRSIREGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.28%

208.00%

-137.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.50%

208.00%

-137.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.50%

208.00%

-137.50%

MNRS vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNRS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNRS vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison

MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while IREG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNRS and IREG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IREG.

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for IREG.

MNRS is categorized as Blockchain, while IREG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MNRS and 0.75% for IREG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNRS and IREG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer