MNRS vs. GDOG
MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) and GDOG (Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index, while GDOG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MNRS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GDOG.
Performance
MNRS vs. GDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNRS achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than GDOG's -40.48% return.
MNRS
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.02%
GDOG
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -39.80%
- YTD
- -40.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $151.06K | $186.23K | $348.71K | |
| $301.29K | $286.50K | $542.86K |
MNRS vs. GDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 15.24% | -1.38% |
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | -40.48% | -19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNRS and GDOG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNRS vs. GDOG — Risk / Return Rank
MNRS
GDOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MNRS vs. GDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNRS | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNRS vs. GDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNRS drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, roughly equal to the maximum GDOG drawdown of -55.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS and GDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNRS | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -55.65% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.48% | -55.17% | +18.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.92% | -33.53% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.84% | — | — |
Volatility
MNRS vs. GDOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNRS | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.89% | 68.93% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.74% | 68.93% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.74% | 68.93% | +3.81% |
MNRS vs. GDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNRS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNRS vs. GDOG - Dividend Comparison
MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while GDOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.47% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNRS and GDOG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MNRS.
MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for GDOG.
MNRS is categorized as Blockchain, while GDOG is Cryptocurrency. MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index, while GDOG tracks CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MNRS and 0.35% for GDOG.
Find the right allocation for MNRS and GDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer