MNRS vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. MNRS is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, MNRS returned 129.17% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. MNRS charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

MNRS vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS achieves a 66.15% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.

MNRS

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 35.90%
• YTD: 66.15%
• 6M: 40.56%
• 1Y: 129.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	66.15%	12.66%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS and BAMU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

MNRS vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 45
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNRS	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	4.98	-3.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	8.77	-6.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	2.41	-1.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	24.89	-22.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	97.89	-93.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MNRS vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRS and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNRS	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	4.98	-3.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	4.14	-3.29

Drawdowns

MNRS vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNRS	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.70%	-0.36%	-56.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.70%	-0.12%	-56.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.42%	0.00%	-8.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.73%	-0.02%	-23.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.93%	0.03%	+28.90%

Volatility

MNRS vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a higher volatility of 20.30% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that MNRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNRS	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.30%	0.07%	+20.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.57%	0.43%	+52.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.28%	0.59%	+69.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.50%	0.87%	+69.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.50%	0.87%	+69.63%

MNRS vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNRS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNRS vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.33%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNRS and BAMU in my portfolio?

MNRS and BAMU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNRS or BAMU?

MNRS has higher volatility (20.30%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNRS dropped -56.70% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, MNRS or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 129.17% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MNRS or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 129.17% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNRS or BAMU?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNRS or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.33% for MNRS.

What is the main difference between MNRS and BAMU?

MNRS is categorized as Blockchain, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MNRS and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.