MNRGX vs. MRFOX
MNRGX (Manor Investment Funds Growth Fund) and MRFOX (Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MNRGX returned 14.81%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for MRFOX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNRGX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MRFOX.
Performance
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNRGX achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRGX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 14.81%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.
MNRGX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
MRFOX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNRGX Manor Investment Funds Growth Fund | 7.41% | 15.41% | 18.27% | 22.77% | -17.43% | 27.93% | 26.64% | 30.79% | -6.01% | 24.44% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.49% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNRGX and MRFOX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MNRGX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNRGX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank
MNRGX
MRFOX
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manor Investment Funds Growth Fund (MNRGX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNRGX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.37 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 4.05 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNRGX drawdown since its inception was -56.04%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRGX and MRFOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNRGX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.04% | -29.10% | -26.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -7.03% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | -7.91% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -12.98% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.57% | -29.10% | -1.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.97% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -2.36% | -11.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 2.37% | +1.77% |
Volatility
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison
Manor Investment Funds Growth Fund (MNRGX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.92%. This indicates that MNRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNRGX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 2.92% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 6.91% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 9.83% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 12.08% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 14.19% | +5.21% |
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNRGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNRGX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison
MNRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than MRFOX's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNRGX Manor Investment Funds Growth Fund | 7.97% | 8.56% | 0.00% | 2.98% | 5.34% | 4.81% | 11.66% | 3.00% | 9.20% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 3.46% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.60% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNRGX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNRGX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to MRFOX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNRGX dropped -56.04% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.
MNRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNRGX and MRFOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer