MNDIX vs. UMBHX
MNDIX (MFS New Discovery Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. MNDIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNDIX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNDIX MFS New Discovery Fund | -0.97% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDIX and UMBHX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNDIX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDIX
UMBHX
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS New Discovery Fund (MNDIX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -20.59 | +21.02 |
Drawdowns
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDIX drawdown since its inception was -62.02%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDIX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.02% | -1.86% | -60.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -1.86% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -1.26% | -15.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | — | — |
Volatility
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNDIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 6.22% | +13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 6.22% | +16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 6.22% | +15.84% |
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNDIX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MNDIX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDIX MFS New Discovery Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 20.76% | 9.22% | 7.01% | 23.11% | 9.34% | 2.24% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNDIX and UMBHX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MNDIX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer