PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNCEX vs. PPYPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund (MNCEX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNCEX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than PPYPX's 13.80% return.


MNCEX

1D
0.82%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.30%
6M
13.02%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

PPYPX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.11%
YTD
13.80%
6M
12.84%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MNCEX
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund
10.30%37.46%6.24%18.86%-16.89%11.36%9.63%10.44%
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
13.80%31.34%-1.15%18.13%-8.73%10.68%2.05%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MNCEX and PPYPX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019

0.78

The correlation between MNCEX and PPYPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNCEX vs. PPYPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNCEX
MNCEX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MNCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MNCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PPYPX
PPYPX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PPYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PPYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund (MNCEX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNCEXPPYPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.64

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

12.09

-3.36

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNCEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the PPYPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNCEX and PPYPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNCEXPPYPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.14

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.44

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.47

+0.22

Drawdowns

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNCEX drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, smaller than the maximum PPYPX drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNCEX and PPYPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNCEXPPYPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.79%

-42.48%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-7.48%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-14.00%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.57%

-35.65%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.46%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-10.15%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.25%

+0.86%

Volatility

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Volatility Comparison

Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund (MNCEX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) at 3.03%. This indicates that MNCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPYPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNCEXPPYPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

3.03%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

9.93%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

12.77%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

19.54%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

19.02%

-0.78%

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNCEX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PPYPX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNCEX vs. PPYPX - Dividend Comparison

MNCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than PPYPX's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MNCEX
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund
12.37%13.64%8.97%3.60%3.14%18.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
6.84%7.78%6.57%10.09%7.20%27.06%2.23%4.20%5.96%2.53%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNCEX and PPYPX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNCEX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to PPYPX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNCEX dropped -32.79% vs PPYPX's -42.48%.

PPYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNCEX and PPYPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer