MNCEX vs. MSCGX
MNCEX (Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund) and MSCGX (Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - MNCEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Mercer Funds, while MSCGX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Mercer Funds. Over the past 5 years, MNCEX returned 9.91%/yr vs 6.91%/yr for MSCGX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNCEX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for MSCGX.
Performance
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNCEX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than MSCGX's 12.25% return.
MNCEX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 25.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
MSCGX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 24.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- —
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNCEX Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund | 10.30% | 37.46% | 6.24% | 18.86% | -16.89% | 11.36% | 9.63% | 10.44% |
MSCGX Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund | 12.25% | 6.52% | 13.39% | 15.35% | -16.91% | 24.32% | 12.40% | 9.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNCEX and MSCGX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between MNCEX and MSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNCEX vs. MSCGX — Risk / Return Rank
MNCEX
MSCGX
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund (MNCEX) and Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (MSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNCEX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.19 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 11.45 | -2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNCEX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.85 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.30 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.39 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNCEX drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, smaller than the maximum MSCGX drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNCEX and MSCGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNCEX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.79% | -41.30% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -9.22% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.79% | -24.28% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.57% | -35.66% | +5.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.40% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -12.75% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.47% | +0.64% |
Volatility
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Volatility Comparison
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund (MNCEX) and Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund (MSCGX) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNCEX | MSCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.45% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 12.00% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 15.88% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 23.81% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 25.50% | -7.26% |
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNCEX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MSCGX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNCEX vs. MSCGX - Dividend Comparison
MNCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than MSCGX's 6.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNCEX Mercer Non-US Core Equity Fund | 12.37% | 13.64% | 8.97% | 3.60% | 3.14% | 18.31% |
MSCGX Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Fund | 6.87% | 7.71% | 10.73% | 3.77% | 8.42% | 20.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNCEX and MSCGX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSCGX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to MNCEX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNCEX dropped -32.79% vs MSCGX's -41.30%.
MNCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNCEX and MSCGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer