PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNBD vs. SMTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNBD vs. SMTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNBD achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than SMTH's 0.48% return.


MNBD

1D
0.04%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.73%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
10Y*

SMTH

1D
0.14%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.37%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNBD vs. SMTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
1.36%5.15%2.41%1.41%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
0.48%6.86%2.76%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MNBD and SMTH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.68

The correlation between MNBD and SMTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

MNBD vs. SMTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MNBD
SMTH

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

-1.0%

-

Basic Materials

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Communication Services

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Consumer Cyclical

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Consumer Defensive

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Energy

MNBD

-

SMTH
100.0%

Healthcare

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Industrials

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Real Estate

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Technology

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Utilities

MNBD

-

SMTH

-

Financial Services

MNBD
-1.0%
SMTH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNBD vs. SMTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNBD
MNBD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MNBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MNBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNBD Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNBD vs. SMTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNBDSMTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.21

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.70

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

5.10

+3.40

MNBD vs. SMTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNBD Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SMTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNBD and SMTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNBDSMTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.21

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.20

0.00

Drawdowns

MNBD vs. SMTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNBD drawdown since its inception was -5.89%, which is greater than SMTH's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBD and SMTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNBDSMTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-4.11%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-2.74%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.28%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-1.06%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.91%

-0.19%

Volatility

MNBD vs. SMTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) is 0.87%, while ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that MNBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNBDSMTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

1.30%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

2.66%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

3.89%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

4.58%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

4.58%

-0.81%

MNBD vs. SMTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNBD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SMTH's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNBD vs. SMTH - Dividend Comparison

MNBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than SMTH's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MNBD
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
3.32%3.32%3.83%3.44%2.40%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.40%4.46%4.58%0.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNBD and SMTH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMTH has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to MNBD (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNBD dropped -5.89% vs SMTH's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, MNBD leads with 6.15% vs 4.64% for SMTH. On fees, MNBD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MNBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MNBD has performed better with a 6.15% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MNBD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SMTH.

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.32% for MNBD.

MNBD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SMTH is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MNBD and 0.59% for SMTH.

MNBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNBD and SMTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer