PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMU vs. FRIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMU vs. FRIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMU achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than FRIAX's 5.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MMU has underperformed FRIAX with an annualized return of 1.28%, while FRIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.64% annualized return.


MMU

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.64%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.28%

FRIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.86%
YTD
5.29%
6M
5.72%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMU vs. FRIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc
0.21%9.19%6.58%5.63%-19.58%5.83%0.71%10.08%-4.55%8.30%
FRIAX
Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class
5.29%12.02%7.29%8.84%-5.36%17.51%3.72%16.02%-5.23%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MMU and FRIAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.11

The correlation between MMU and FRIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMU vs. FRIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMU
MMU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIAX
FRIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FRIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMU vs. FRIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMUFRIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

3.01

-1.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

4.68

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.68

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.95

-3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.56

18.94

-12.39

MMU vs. FRIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FRIAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMU and FRIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMUFRIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

3.01

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.81

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.82

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.80

-0.43

Drawdowns

MMU vs. FRIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMU drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, smaller than the maximum FRIAX drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMU and FRIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMUFRIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.51%

-43.23%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-3.06%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.86%

-7.35%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.89%

-13.63%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.51%

-24.10%

-10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-0.33%

-6.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-3.92%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.80%

+0.88%

Volatility

MMU vs. FRIAX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX) at 1.19%. This indicates that MMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMUFRIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

1.19%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

3.80%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.31%

5.04%

+3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.68%

7.98%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

9.30%

+3.71%

MMU vs. FRIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMU has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIAX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMU vs. FRIAX - Dividend Comparison

MMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than FRIAX's 5.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIAX
Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class
5.71%5.75%5.74%5.67%5.24%6.70%5.37%5.25%5.80%5.20%4.92%5.93%
MMU
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc
6.42%6.26%6.16%4.36%4.65%3.88%4.21%4.96%5.68%5.37%5.67%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMU and FRIAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMU has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to FRIAX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMU dropped -34.51% vs FRIAX's -43.23%.

FRIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMU and FRIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer