PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMT vs. RPSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMT vs. RPSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income Fund (RPSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMT achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than RPSIX's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MMT has outperformed RPSIX with an annualized return of 6.03%, while RPSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


MMT

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.65%
1Y
6.42%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
6.03%

RPSIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.79%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMT vs. RPSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMT
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
0.79%8.10%12.40%10.14%-22.96%13.11%8.88%30.32%-7.70%9.29%
RPSIX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income Fund
1.73%9.91%5.62%8.55%-11.40%2.60%6.07%11.57%-2.61%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MMT and RPSIX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1990

0.24

The correlation between MMT and RPSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMT vs. RPSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMT
MMT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

RPSIX
RPSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RPSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RPSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMT vs. RPSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income Fund (RPSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMTRPSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

2.86

-2.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

5.00

-3.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.65

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.70

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.25

17.93

-14.69

MMT vs. RPSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the RPSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMT and RPSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMTRPSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

2.86

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.59

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.87

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.50

-1.09

Drawdowns

MMT vs. RPSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMT drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than RPSIX's maximum drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMT and RPSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTRPSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-16.73%

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-2.54%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.23%

-4.92%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.29%

-16.73%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-16.73%

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-0.09%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-1.69%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.52%

+1.53%

Volatility

MMT vs. RPSIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income Fund (RPSIX) at 1.13%. This indicates that MMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTRPSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

1.13%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

2.49%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

3.12%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.59%

4.51%

+7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.30%

4.55%

+9.75%

MMT vs. RPSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RPSIX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMT vs. RPSIX - Dividend Comparison

MMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than RPSIX's 7.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMT
MFS Multimarket Income Trust
8.90%8.65%8.65%8.65%9.38%7.86%8.07%8.16%9.86%8.83%8.71%9.05%
RPSIX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income Fund
7.98%7.45%6.57%4.83%3.99%3.92%3.64%3.79%4.73%3.91%3.75%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMT and RPSIX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMT has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to RPSIX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMT dropped -35.70% vs RPSIX's -16.73%.

RPSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMT and RPSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer