MMSMY vs. ELA
MMSMY (Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR) and ELA (Envela Corporation) are both stocks. MMSMY operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while ELA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MMSMY returned 15.45%/yr vs 38.58%/yr for ELA. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MMSMY vs. ELA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMSMY achieves a 68.68% return, which is significantly higher than ELA's 62.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MMSMY has underperformed ELA with an annualized return of 15.45%, while ELA has yielded a comparatively higher 38.58% annualized return.
MMSMY
- 1D
- 8.18%
- 1M
- -20.73%
- 6M
- 44.43%
- YTD
- 68.68%
- 1Y
- 399.61%
- 3Y*
- 103.96%
- 5Y*
- 48.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
ELA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.18%
- 6M
- 58.94%
- YTD
- 62.03%
- 1Y
- 294.90%
- 3Y*
- 42.01%
- 5Y*
- 37.44%
- 10Y*
- 38.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.70M | $2.90M | $3.20M | |
| $1.10M | $804.65K | $428.87K |
MMSMY vs. ELA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMSMY Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR | 68.68% | 314.15% | -5.32% | 29.11% | -15.77% | -25.22% | 41.60% | 23.63% | -64.70% | -7.41% |
ELA Envela Corporation | 62.03% | 86.35% | 47.74% | -7.60% | 29.24% | -21.73% | 285.19% | 193.54% | -50.55% | -25.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMSMY and ELA is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2014 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
MMSMY:
$10.86B
ELA:
$562.89M
MMSMY:
¥325.22
ELA:
$0.81
MMSMY:
18.38
ELA:
26.88
MMSMY:
0.23
ELA:
0.94
MMSMY:
2.22
ELA:
1.93
MMSMY:
4.13
ELA:
7.42
MMSMY:
¥769.12B
ELA:
$291.15M
MMSMY:
¥205.75B
ELA:
$62.58M
MMSMY:
¥167.04B
ELA:
$22.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMSMY vs. ELA — Risk / Return Rank
MMSMY
ELA
MMSMY vs. ELA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR (MMSMY) and Envela Corporation (ELA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMSMY | ELA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.56 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.71 | 10.61 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.39 | 31.31 | -7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMSMY vs. ELA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMSMY drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, smaller than the maximum ELA drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSMY and ELA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMSMY | ELA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -97.32% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.28% | -28.50% | -23.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.28% | -45.05% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.28% | -61.53% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.33% | -78.03% | -13.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.81% | -24.93% | -18.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -57.46% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.19% | 9.63% | +7.56% |
Volatility
MMSMY vs. ELA - Volatility Comparison
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR (MMSMY) has a higher volatility of 26.36% compared to Envela Corporation (ELA) at 11.58%. This indicates that MMSMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMSMY | ELA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.36% | 11.58% | +14.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.06% | 51.12% | +10.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.04% | 71.58% | +15.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.79% | 54.09% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 65.23% | -4.42% |
Dividends
MMSMY vs. ELA - Dividend Comparison
Neither MMSMY nor ELA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ELA Envela Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMSMY Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR | 0.00% | 0.55% | 2.16% |
Financials
MMSMY vs. ELA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR and Envela Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MMSMY vs. ELA - Profitability Comparison
MMSMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 75.67B and revenue of 220.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.
ELA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Envela Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.62M and revenue of 98.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
MMSMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 60.27B and revenue of 220.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
ELA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Envela Corporation reported an operating income of 11.21M and revenue of 98.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
MMSMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 42.99B and revenue of 220.30B, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
ELA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Envela Corporation reported a net income of 8.84M and revenue of 98.38M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MMSMY and ELA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMSMY has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to ELA (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSMY dropped -91.33% vs ELA's -97.32%.
MMSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 4.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMSMY and ELA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer