MMSC vs. IVOG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MMSC (First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF) and IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. MMSC is actively managed, while IVOG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMSC returned 22.46%/yr vs 17.82%/yr for IVOG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMSC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IVOG.

Performance

MMSC vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MMSC having a 18.98% return and IVOG slightly lower at 18.88%.

MMSC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 18.98%
• 6M: 15.48%
• 1Y: 40.59%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVOG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 18.88%
• 6M: 15.91%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 11.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSC vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF	18.98%	15.45%	22.19%	18.76%	-30.98%	1.25%
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	18.88%	7.34%	15.62%	17.36%	-19.08%	6.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSC and IVOG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2021	0.93

The correlation between MMSC and IVOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MMSC vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSC

MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 60
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

IVOG

IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 59
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSC vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMSC	IVOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.63	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.35	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.97	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	11.57	-0.68

MMSC vs. IVOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the IVOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSC and IVOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMSC vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOG drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and IVOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMSC	IVOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.82%	-39.32%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.10%	-9.69%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.76%	-25.61%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-1.48%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.57%	-5.86%	-12.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	2.49%	+1.25%

Volatility

MMSC vs. IVOG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) at 5.76%. This indicates that MMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMSC	IVOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	5.76%	+2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.20%	13.87%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.52%	17.68%	+5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.58%	20.70%	+3.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.58%	20.61%	+3.97%

MMSC vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMSC vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison

MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	0.54%	0.64%	0.79%	1.15%	1.05%	0.47%	0.74%	1.17%	1.01%	0.93%	1.11%	1.04%
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMSC and IVOG in my portfolio?

MMSC and IVOG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMSC or IVOG?

MMSC has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to IVOG (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSC dropped -40.82% vs IVOG's -39.32%.

Which ETF is better, MMSC or IVOG?

On 3-year performance, MMSC leads with 22.46% vs 17.82% for IVOG. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMSC or IVOG?

Over the 3-year period, MMSC has performed better with a 22.46% return vs 17.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMSC or IVOG?

IVOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMSC or IVOG?

IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.

What is the main difference between MMSC and IVOG?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MMSC and 0.15% for IVOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.