MMS vs. MSFT
MMS (Maximus, Inc.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. MMS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MMS returned 1.68%/yr vs 24.97%/yr for MSFT. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MMS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMS achieves a -29.50% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MMS has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 1.68%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.97% annualized return.
MMS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 8.07%
- 6M
- -35.56%
- YTD
- -29.50%
- 1Y
- -15.92%
- 3Y*
- -8.93%
- 5Y*
- -6.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.90%
MSFT
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- -10.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.90M | $35.50M | $44.30M | |
| $17.39B | $14.79B | $16.23B |
MMS vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMS Maximus, Inc. | -29.50% | 17.47% | -9.70% | 16.01% | -6.39% | 10.31% | -0.07% | 15.90% | -8.53% | 28.68% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -3.48% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMS and MSFT is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 1997 | 0.30 |
The correlation between MMS and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MMS:
$3.17B
MSFT:
$3.45T
MMS:
$6.70
MSFT:
$17.94
MMS:
9.00
MSFT:
25.91
MMS:
0.71
MSFT:
1.50
MMS:
0.63
MSFT:
10.44
MMS:
1.95
MSFT:
7.83
MMS:
$5.32B
MSFT:
$331.84B
MMS:
$1.31B
MSFT:
$225.47B
MMS:
$654.04M
MSFT:
$207.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMS vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
MMS
MSFT
MMS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMS | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.95 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.35 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -0.63 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMS drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMS and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMS | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.45% | -69.38% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.11% | -34.50% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.11% | -34.50% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.11% | -37.15% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -37.15% | -7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.49% | -13.73% | -24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -21.80% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.40% | 19.35% | +5.05% |
Volatility
MMS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Maximus, Inc. (MMS) is 9.23%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that MMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMS | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 15.97% | -6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.90% | 26.41% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.34% | 31.93% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.07% | 28.00% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.59% | 27.62% | -0.03% |
Dividends
MMS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
MMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than MSFT's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMS Maximus, Inc. | 2.09% | 1.39% | 1.61% | 1.36% | 1.53% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.77% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
MMS vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Maximus, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MMS vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
MMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 362.56M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 60.48B and revenue of 90.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
MMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported an operating income of 148.49M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 40.60B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
MMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported a net income of 98.06M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 35.77B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in a net margin of 39.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MMS and MSFT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to MMS (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMS dropped -61.45% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMS and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer