MMS.L vs. CACX.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L).

MMS.L and CACX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MMS.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 7, 2017. CACX.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR. It was launched on Dec 13, 2018. Both MMS.L and CACX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	-1.78%	19.60%	-7.32%

Different Trading Currencies

MMS.L is traded in GBP, while CACX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CACX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

MMS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CACX.L

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CACX.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

MMS.L

Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

CACX.L

Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Return for Risk

MMS.L vs. CACX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACX.L

CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMS.L	CACX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.51	—

Dividends

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Dividend Comparison

MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.96%	2.90%	3.00%	2.78%	2.54%	1.95%	1.66%	3.03%	3.70%	2.94%	3.49%	3.46%

Drawdowns

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMS.L drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CACX.L drawdown of -32.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMS.L and CACX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMS.L	CACX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-32.83%	+32.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-11.81%	+11.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.66%	+7.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-5.30%	+5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	3.37%	-3.37%

Volatility

MMS.L vs. CACX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) is 0.00%, while Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that MMS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CACX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMS.L	CACX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	5.24%	-5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	10.00%	-10.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	15.42%	-15.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	16.56%	-16.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	17.56%	-17.56%