MMMA vs. FTCA
MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) and FTCA (Franklin California Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
MMMA vs. FTCA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than FTCA's 2.87% return.
MMMA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTCA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMMA vs. FTCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 3.87% | 0.35% |
FTCA Franklin California Municipal Income ETF | 2.87% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMMA and FTCA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMMA vs. FTCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMMA vs. FTCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCA drawdown of -2.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and FTCA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMMA | FTCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -2.92% | +0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -0.61% | +0.07% |
Volatility
MMMA vs. FTCA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMMA | FTCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.41% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 3.41% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 3.41% | +0.59% |
MMMA vs. FTCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MMMA and FTCA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
MMMA vs. FTCA - Dividend Comparison
MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FTCA's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTCA Franklin California Municipal Income ETF | 2.33% | 0.74% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 1.94% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMMA and FTCA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMMA and FTCA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
FTCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.94% for MMMA.
They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for MMMA and FTCA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer