PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMM vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MMM vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 4.58%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.


MMM

1D
0.26%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.58%

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.88%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMM vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMM
3M Company
-0.15%26.36%46.13%-3.33%-29.63%4.85%2.77%-4.29%-16.90%34.90%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MMM and NFLX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.24

The correlation between MMM and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MMM:

$84.35B

NFLX:

$345.34B

EPS

MMM:

$5.17

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

MMM:

30.65

NFLX:

25.99

PS Ratio

MMM:

3.41

NFLX:

7.41

PB Ratio

MMM:

25.85

NFLX:

11.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

MMM:

$25.02B

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MMM:

$9.89B

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

MMM:

$5.28B

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMM vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMM
MMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMM vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMMNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.81

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.78

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

-1.35

+2.69

MMM vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMM vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.10%

-81.99%

+22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.77%

-43.35%

+24.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-43.35%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.34%

-75.95%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

-75.95%

+16.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-40.01%

+31.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-24.91%

+8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

25.19%

-16.71%

Volatility

MMM vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

3M Company (MMM) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that MMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

5.85%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

24.58%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.96%

33.05%

-7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

43.09%

-14.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.53%

41.49%

-14.96%

Dividends

MMM vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMM
3M Company
1.91%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MMM vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
6.03B
12.25B
(MMM) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MMM vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between 3M Company and Netflix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.7%
51.9%
Portfolio components
MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.46B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMM and NFLX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMM has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

MMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMM and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer