MMM vs. DBC

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

MMM (3M Company) is a stock, while DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) is Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Over the past 10 years, MMM returned 5.38%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for DBC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

MMM vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed DBC with an annualized return of 5.38%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.

MMM

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 14.41%
• 6M: 12.24%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 1Y: 23.58%
• 3Y*: 31.33%
• 5Y*: 5.61%
• 10Y*: 5.38%
• ALL TIME*: 8.48%

DBC

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 5.48%
• 6M: 17.73%
• YTD: 27.37%
• 1Y: 34.92%
• 3Y*: 9.99%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 8.90%
• ALL TIME*: 1.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	$29.84M	$30.72M	$31.47M
MMM 3M Company	$672.67M	$635.33M	$619.54M

MMM vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMM 3M Company	14.83%	26.36%	46.13%	-3.33%	-29.63%	4.85%	2.77%	-4.29%	-16.90%	34.90%
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	27.37%	8.10%	2.18%	-6.19%	19.34%	41.36%	-7.84%	11.84%	-11.63%	4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MMM and DBC is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006	0.20

The correlation between MMM and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MMM vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMM

MMM Risk / Return Rank: 68
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

DBC

DBC Risk / Return Rank: 59
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMM vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMM	DBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.78	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.38	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	2.12	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	6.91	-4.19

MMM vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMM vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and DBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMM	DBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.10%	-76.36%	+17.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.77%	-16.54%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.66%	-16.54%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.23%	-27.34%	-25.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.10%	-41.71%	-17.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-26.32%	+26.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-46.06%	+29.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.68%	5.07%	+3.61%

Volatility

MMM vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

3M Company (MMM) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 7.61%. This indicates that MMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMM	DBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	7.61%	+2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.69%	16.61%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.71%	19.70%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.63%	19.33%	+9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.73%	17.89%	+8.84%

Dividends

MMM vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than DBC's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	2.61%	3.33%	5.22%	4.94%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	1.59%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMM 3M Company	1.66%	1.82%	16.27%	5.49%	4.97%	3.33%	3.36%	3.26%	2.86%	2.00%	2.49%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMM and DBC in my portfolio?

MMM and DBC have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMM or DBC?

MMM has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to DBC (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs DBC's -76.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.