PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMM vs. CARE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MMM vs. CARE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than CARE's 52.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed CARE with an annualized return of 4.58%, while CARE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


MMM

1D
0.26%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.58%

CARE

1D
1.07%
1M
12.31%
YTD
52.54%
6M
50.09%
1Y
79.68%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMM vs. CARE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMM
3M Company
-0.15%26.36%46.13%-3.33%-29.63%4.85%2.77%-4.29%-16.90%34.90%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
52.54%11.77%17.50%-9.76%7.80%43.56%-54.48%58.13%-14.53%32.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MMM and CARE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2012

0.27

The correlation between MMM and CARE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MMM:

$84.35B

CARE:

$652.68M

EPS

MMM:

$5.17

CARE:

$4.87

PE Ratio

MMM:

30.65

CARE:

6.13

PS Ratio

MMM:

3.41

CARE:

2.07

PB Ratio

MMM:

25.85

CARE:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

MMM:

$25.02B

CARE:

$319.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MMM:

$9.89B

CARE:

$256.97M

EBITDA (TTM)

MMM:

$5.28B

CARE:

$142.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMM vs. CARE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMM
MMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CARE
CARE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CARE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CARE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMM vs. CARE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMMCAREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.53

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

5.06

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

14.55

-13.20

MMM vs. CARE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the CARE Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and CARE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMM vs. CARE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum CARE drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and CARE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMCAREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.10%

-73.17%

+14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.77%

-15.83%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-35.75%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.34%

-42.95%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

-73.17%

+14.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

0.00%

-8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-19.46%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

5.50%

+2.98%

Volatility

MMM vs. CARE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3M Company (MMM) is 6.23%, while Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that MMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMCAREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

8.65%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

18.11%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.96%

26.45%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

31.05%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.53%

36.81%

-10.28%

Dividends

MMM vs. CARE - Dividend Comparison

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than CARE's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.26%2.96%
MMM
3M Company
1.91%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%

Financials

MMM vs. CARE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Carter Bankshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.03B
130.16M
(MMM) Total Revenue
(CARE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MMM and CARE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARE has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to MMM (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs CARE's -73.17%.

CARE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMM and CARE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer