MMKT vs. QQUP
MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) and QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital, while QQUP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%). MMKT is actively managed, while QQUP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. MMKT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QQUP.
Performance
MMKT vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQUP's 14.50% return.
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQUP
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.44% | 2.24% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 14.50% | 44.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMKT and QQUP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMKT vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank
MMKT
QQUP
MMKT vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMKT | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 15.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 153.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 910.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMKT | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 17.60 | 1.77 | +15.83 |
Drawdowns
MMKT vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum QQUP drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and QQUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMKT | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -37.67% | +37.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.42% | +6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -9.20% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
MMKT vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMKT | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23% | 38.52% | -38.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 38.52% | -38.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 38.52% | -38.29% |
MMKT vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMKT vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison
MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than QQUP's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMKT and QQUP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.
MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.
MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while QQUP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.95% for QQUP.
Find the right allocation for MMKT and QQUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer