PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMKT vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMKT vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 44.44% return.


MMKT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.01%

QQQA

1D
1.29%
1M
-5.50%
6M
31.12%
YTD
44.44%
1Y
62.87%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$508.57K$519.13K$740.73K
$2.42M$3.28M$3.82M

MMKT vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and QQQA is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.02

The correlation between MMKT and QQQA shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMKT vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMKT vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMKTQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+15.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+63.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

17.69

1.32

+16.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

149.89

2.82

+147.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

940.27

9.70

+930.57

MMKT vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 17.13, which is higher than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMKTQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-38.44%

+38.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-22.41%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.45%

+17.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-15.52%

+15.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

6.50%

-6.50%

Volatility

MMKT vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.06%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMKTQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

10.99%

-10.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

29.73%

-29.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

33.66%

-33.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.23%

27.46%

-27.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.23%

27.08%

-26.85%

MMKT vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMKT vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than QQQA's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.65%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.03%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMKT and QQQA have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to MMKT (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 1-year performance, QQQA leads with 62.87% vs 3.72% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 62.87% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.03% for QQQA.

MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.58% for QQQA.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.13 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMKT and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer