PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMIT vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMIT vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MMIT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.79%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIT vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


MMIT vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMIT
QCON

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.5%

Financial Services

-1.1%
7.9%

Basic Materials

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Communication Services

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Consumer Defensive

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Energy

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Healthcare

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Industrials

MMIT

-

QCON
1.0%

Real Estate

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Technology

MMIT

-

QCON

-

Utilities

MMIT

-

QCON
1.5%

Financial Services

MMIT
-1.1%
QCON
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMIT vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT
MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMITQCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

MMIT vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMITQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMITQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

0.00%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

0.00%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

0.00%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

Volatility

MMIT vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMITQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

0.00%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

0.00%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.30%

0.00%

+4.30%

MMIT vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMIT vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMIT
IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF
3.57%3.54%3.76%3.46%2.30%1.81%2.59%4.14%2.46%0.35%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MMIT is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMIT is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

MMIT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMIT and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer