MMIT vs. QCON
MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMIT is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by New York Life, while QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
MMIT vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MMIT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMIT vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.11% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
MMIT vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMIT
QCON
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Communication Services
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Energy
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Healthcare
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Industrials
MMIT
-
QCON
Real Estate
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Technology
MMIT
-
QCON
-
Utilities
MMIT
-
QCON
Financial Services
MMIT
QCON
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMIT vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
MMIT
QCON
MMIT vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMIT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMIT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MMIT vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMIT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | 0.00% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | 0.00% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | 0.00% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | — | — |
Volatility
MMIT vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMIT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 0.00% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 0.00% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 0.00% | +4.30% |
MMIT vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMIT vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 3.57% | 3.54% | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.59% | 4.14% | 2.46% | 0.35% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MMIT is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMIT is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
MMIT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for MMIT and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer