MMIT vs. DWAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMIT is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by New York Life, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.

Performance

MMIT vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MMIT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

DWAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIT vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.11%
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%

MMIT vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MMIT	DWAT
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.5%
Energy	-	4.2%
Healthcare	-	5.3%
Industrials	-	25.1%
Real Estate	-	5.1%
Technology	-	10.2%
Utilities	-	5.3%
Financial Services	-1.1%	27.2%

Return for Risk

MMIT vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT

MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 70
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMIT	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMIT	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	—	—

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and DWAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMIT	DWAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	0.00%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	0.00%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	0.00%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMIT	DWAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	0.00%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	0.00%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	0.00%	+4.30%

MMIT vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMIT vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.57%	3.54%	3.76%	3.46%	2.30%	1.81%	2.59%	4.14%	2.46%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MMIT or DWAT?

On fees, MMIT is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMIT or DWAT?

MMIT is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMIT or DWAT?

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

What is the main difference between MMIT and DWAT?

MMIT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 1.83% for DWAT.