MMIT vs. DRLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMIT is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by New York Life, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. MMIT is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMIT returned 3.85%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for DRLL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.

Performance

MMIT vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 31.26% return.

MMIT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

DRLL

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 31.26%
• 6M: 27.14%
• 1Y: 43.09%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIT vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	1.40%	5.03%	1.46%	5.42%	-1.25%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	31.26%	7.74%	0.02%	-1.84%	16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MMIT and DRLL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022	-0.04

The correlation between MMIT and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MMIT vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MMIT	DRLL
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	99.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-
Financial Services	-1.1%	-

Return for Risk

MMIT vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT

MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 70
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 55
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMIT	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.94	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	2.49	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.32	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	3.11	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	8.82	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMIT vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIT and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMIT	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.94	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.57	+0.06

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and DRLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMIT	DRLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-23.73%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.59%	-13.93%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.96%	-23.73%	+19.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-8.10%	+7.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-8.02%	+5.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	4.90%	-4.14%

Volatility

MMIT vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is 0.77%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that MMIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMIT	DRLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	9.15%	-8.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	18.04%	-16.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	22.34%	-19.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	23.76%	-20.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	23.76%	-19.46%

MMIT vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMIT vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than DRLL's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.33%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.57%	3.54%	3.76%	3.46%	2.30%	1.81%	2.59%	4.14%	2.46%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMIT and DRLL in my portfolio?

MMIT and DRLL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMIT or DRLL?

DRLL has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to MMIT (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIT dropped -12.28% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

Which ETF is better, MMIT or DRLL?

On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 14.67% vs 3.85% for MMIT. On fees, MMIT is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, MMIT has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMIT or DRLL?

Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMIT or DRLL?

MMIT is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMIT or DRLL?

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.33% for DRLL.

What is the main difference between MMIT and DRLL?

MMIT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.41% for DRLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.